Guayaquil, as seen from the Santa Ana hill in 2009
By noon time that faithful April day, there was, according to the press, a mass of approximately two hundred thousand people filling the streets from the International Airport to the San Francisco Square in down town Guayaquil. This was, supposedly, the greatest political mass gathering that had ever taken place in the country. The candidate arrived at the San Francisco Square at about one in the afternoon, and, only a few minutes after his arrival he was speaking from “a balcony” to this great mass of people who cheered the man almost in ecstasies.
The Ecuadorian people, just like other peoples in the Latin American countries and in the third world in general, has traditionally been captivated by demagogue politicians who promise redemption at no cost, and so it has fallen victim of its own electoral mistakes. Worse than anything, these mistakes are repeated to the point of absurdity, and unlike what should be expected, no lessons are learned from those mistakes. This was the case with Velasco Ibarra.
The candidate’s speech centered on the idea of considering “voiding the Rio de Janeiro Protocol” (“the Rio Protocol”), a treaty between Peru and Ecuador signed in 1942, and ratified by the congresses of both countries the same year, in which Ecuador was obligated to resign the ownership of almost one hundred thousand miles of its territory in the Eastern Amazonian Jungle, in exchange for the withdrawal of Peruvian military forces that in 1941 had invaded the Ecuadorian Southern Provinces of Loja and El Oro and threatened to take over the city of Guayaquil. The treaty was signed on January 29 of 1942, at the time when WW II was at its peak in Europe and The Pacific.
The loss of such a big chunk of the national territory was considered by most Ecuadorians as the biggest affront to the national pride. We, as school children, were taught to hate the Rio Protocol and to hate Peru and the Peruvians “who had stolen our territory”, we grew up with this idea in mind, so, it was only understandable that the sole idea of denouncing the Protocol and eventually recovering the “stolen territory” would lift the hearts and minds of most Ecuadorians and would place them behind the man who was talking about reversing history and returning our pride.
As a lawyer and as a politician knowledgeable of international Law, he must have known that the Rio Protocol could not be nullified unilaterally, however, as a demagogue that he was, he knew the Ecuadorians would like his idea, and he knew that promoting it would bring the votes he needed to be elected. His speech was one hour long, people were so emotional that they started to cry and intensely cheered and applauded to the man in the balcony. My friends and I, who had been standing critically at first, and curiously later on, little by little started to listen with more attention to the speaker, then we began to get emotional and nodded approvingly to some of his remarks, but, by mid speech, we were all applauding and cheering for the guy. Velasco was a combination of sorcerer and alchemist. He knew how to mix his ideas to hypnotize and convince people. He was elected by a landslide in 1960. The sum of the votes of all the other candidates did not reach one half of the votes he finally obtained. It was a landslide!
Making the biggest political mistake of my life, I ended up voting for him but was promptly disenchanted with his widely corrupt administration which came to a sudden end when a military coup deposed him, confirming that the guy was an unbeatable candidate but a terrible president. I wasted my first vote as a citizen when I helped elect as a President to a man who did not deserve my vote, a man whom at his age, was pathetically tricked by his political associates into allowing them to steal the country blind. I learned a great political lesson and matured politically, because I never again voted based on my emotions but on a cold analysis of the merits of each candidate and his/her programs, regardless of their party affiliation
The courtship from my communist schoolmates continued for another year to no avail. Finally they gave up and decided that I was a “reactionary” and that it wasn’t worth continuing to try and hire me as their party’s member.
The last two years of high School I returned to my high standards, As always, I excelled at math and Physics, I loved and was very good at History and Literature, I was good at Biology and at Organic Chemistry, I finished my Fifth year of High School with an A average.
Sometime during the year 1960 my brother Pepe got married and could not continue to support our household, my brother Pancho was never a real help but a dead weight in our place. Soon after, At the age of 18, my brother Pancho married a woman 2 years his senior when he had no job and no place to live. To make things even worse, my mom started to suspect that my dad had not been that faithful while she was away in Guayaquil, and decided she would return to Pallatanga, so we had to reorganize our lives without her. I rented a room in a boarding house and my little brother Guido went to live with my sister Florcita who had already delivered a baby boy. I took over the responsibility of paying for my little brother’s education at the Mercantil High School, a reputed school from which young adults came out with a diploma as “bookkeepers”, the same school my older brother Pepe had attended and allowed him to start working at the early age of 17.
Considering myself a “guardian” for my little brother, I went one day to his school to find out how he was doing, only to find he had not attended school for the last three months, and therefore, he was by then considered a dropout. This is in spite of the fact that this 14 year old boy was leaving his place every day at 7 AM, with the school bag on his back, and was returning at 1:30 PM, just as if he was punctually attending school. Only God knows what he was doing during those long hours, out of his place and out of the school.
Needless to say, I missed my mom and I missed living as a family, but the circumstances were such that did not allow us to continue living together. I had matured enough to feel as an adult. By this time, I had made my mind and I wanted to become a professional, I knew I had the brain, and I sure had the will, now it was only a matter of “keep on trucking” to reach the goal I had set for myself. In May 1962 I visited mom in Pallatanga and I promised her that I will study hard; that “I will be second to none” and that when I’m done, I will take her to live with me and that she will be able to see the fruits of her hard work through me. Little did I know that a few years later, when I was just starting to be in a position to make my promise a reality, she would suddenly pass away, the victim of her high blood pressure and her weakened heart.
In my next posting: A UNIVERSITY STUDENT